Contact Mark
Sherer, PhD, ABPP-Cn, The Institute for Rehabilitation Research
at
Citation Sherer, M. (2004). The
Confusion Assessment Protocol. The Center for Outcome
Measurement in Brain Injury. http://www.tbims.org/
combi/cap ( accessed
).
CAP
Properties
Reliability:
The CAP is still in an early stage of development and specific reliability
studies have not yet been conducted. However, all but 2 CAP items
(Sleep-disturbance and Level of Arousal/Daytime Drowsiness) were
taken from previously developed scales. Data regarding the reliability
of these scales may pertain to the CAP. These data may be found
by reviewing articles on the original scales. Complete references
for these scales can be found in the Reference section.
Validity:
Preliminary concurrent validity for the CAP has been assessed by
comparing classification as confused (in PCS) vs. non-confused (not
in PCS) to classification as in delirium vs. not in delirium based
on DSM-IV criteria. Sherer, Nakase-Thompson, and Yablon (2003) studied
62 patients with moderate or severe TBI at admission to inpatient
rehabilitation. Findings revealed that 44 (71%) of patients met
CAP criteria for confusion while 40 (64%) met DSM-IV criteria for
delirium at admission to inpatient rehabilitation. Of the 44 confused
patients, 38 also met criteria for delirium and of the 40 delirious
patients, 38 also met criteria for confusion. Overall agreement
was 87%.
Sherer,
Nakase-Thompson, Nick, and Yablon (2003) performed a cluster analysis
on the same sample of 62 patients. Two distinct patterns of confusion
emerged. Patients in one cluster were all agitated and showed a
high incidence of psychotic-type symptoms. Patients in the other
confused cluster showed no restlessness and a much lower incidence
of psychotic-type symptoms. Patients in this second cluster were
very likely to have decreased day-time arousal. Patients in both
clusters had high incidences of disorientation, cognitive impairment,
and symptom fluctuation.
The
present validity data are preliminary. Additional research is needed
to replicate and extend these findings. The finding of distinct
patterns of confusion may have treatment implications. The ability
of the CAP to capture a wide range of symptoms of confusion makes
it well suited as an outcome measure in clinical trials of treatments
for confusion.