Contact Mark
Sherer, PhD, ABPP-Cn, The Institute for Rehabilitation Research
at
Citation Sherer, M. (2004). The
Confusion Assessment Protocol. The Center for Outcome
Measurement in Brain Injury. http://www.tbims.org/
combi/cap ( accessed
).
Introduction
to the Confusion Assessment Protocol
The
Confusion Assessment Protocol (CAP) is a combination of objective
measures of orientation and cognition and clinician ratings of other
symptoms of early confusion after traumatic brain injury (TBI).
The CAP was developed by Mark Sherer, Risa Nakase-Thompson, and
Stuart A. Yablon for use in investigations of early recovery from
TBI. This measure is still in an early phase of development with
several investigations still ongoing.
Patients
in early recovery from TBI frequently are acutely confused. The
term Post-traumatic Amnesia (PTA) has been used to describe this
state. However, commonly used measures of PTA primarily assess orientation
and memory and fail to assess other symptoms of confusion. More
recently, Stuss and colleagues (Stuss et al., 1999) proposed the
term Post-traumatic Confusional State (PCS) to describe this early
period of recovery after TBI. Stuss and colleagues noted the similarity
of this period of recovery to delirium. These researchers recommended
a focus on assessment of attentional skills in confused patients.
The
CAP was developed to assess a broad range of symptoms of PCS. In
constructing the CAP, scales previously used to assess PTA and delirium
were administered to a sample of patients with TBI who were in inpatient
rehabilitation. These scales included the Galveston Orientation
and Amnesia Test (GOAT; Levin, O’Donnell, & Grossman,
1979), the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS; Corrigan, 1989), the Delirium
Rating Scale – Revised (DRS-R; Trzepacz, Mittal, Torres, Kanary,
Norton, & Jimerson, 2001), the Cognitive Test for Delirium (CTD;
Hart, Levenson, Sessler, Best, Schwartz, & Rutherford, 1996)
and the Toronto Test of Acute Recovery from TBI (TOTART; Stuss et
al., 1999). Patient responses to each item of each scale were reviewed
by 2 clinicians. Items were retained if they differentiated patients
meeting DSM-IV criteria for delirium from those not meeting DSM-IV
criteria and if, in the judgment of the clinicians, they provided
clinically significant information. Items were deleted if they were
redundant or did not discriminate patients who met DSM-IV delirium
criteria from those who did not. Some items were modified. Based
on this analysis, 7 key symptoms of PCS were identified. These are:
(1) disorientation, (2) cognitive impairment, (3) restlessness,
(4) fluctuation in presentation, (5) nighttime sleep disturbance,
(6) decreased daytime level of arousal, and (7) psychotic-type symptoms.
CAP items assess all 7 of these symptoms. Note that all patients
in our sample showed some degree of cognitive impairment. The scoring
criteria for the cognitive items were set to identify those patients
with levels of cognitive impairment that could be seen in patients
with delirium.
As
noted above, the CAP was developed as a research tool. While the
symptoms measured have clear clinical relevance, the clinical utility
of the CAP remains to be demonstrated.
This
information regarding the CAP was provided by Mark Sherer, Ph.D.,
ABPP-Cn of The Institute for Rehabilitation
Research. Please
contact Mark Sherer, PhD, ABPP-Cn, at
Email
address protected by JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript to use email address.
for more
information.
If
you find the information in the COMBI useful, please mention it
when citing sources of information. The information on the Confusion
Assessment Protocol may be cited as:
Sherer, M. (2004). The Confusion Assessment Protocol. The Center
for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury. http://www.tbims.org/combi/cap
( accessed
).